Hi Benjamin, I don't understand what you're getting at exactly, or what represents a "failure". I checked the first RPM in your output, which maps to https://repo.almalinux.org/almalinux/8.10/extras/x86_64/kickstart/Packages/c..., which works just fine and doesn't throw any errors. What's the issue here? On Thu, Apr 2, 2026 at 10:16 AM Retrogrid Tech via Devel < devel@lists.almalinux.org> wrote:

Hello everyone,

We have identified a significant number of non-functioning-repo RPMs and need to know which of these are intentionally non-functional so we can map them correctly in our archive rather than propagating broken repo definitions to enrolled systems.

A simple "intentional" / "defect" next to each in the attached list/report would be fully adequate.

The attached report summary should make it straightforward either to classify these as intentional or to address them as defects.

Thanks,

Benjamin Smith

PS: Apologies if this is not the correct place to report this - Please direct me to the most appropriate channel if this is not it.

For context, we're establishing a temporal mirror of the Enterprise Linux universe - something like a "Wayback Machine" for Linux OS. For completeness, this historical archive includes the results of metalink and mirrorlist queries but many of these do not resolve._______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@lists.almalinux.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.almalinux.org

-- Jonathan Wright AlmaLinux OS Foundation Mattermost: chat <https://chat.almalinux.org/almalinux/messages/@jonathan>