Hi, for the links that point to centos.org consider that packages related to EOL versions are moved to vault.centos.org (for example see https://vault.centos.org/8.5.2111/storage/x86_64/ for some of the repos that gave you issues like Gluster 6). If that's not enough consider asking on CentOS mailing lists. For AlmaLinux repositories have a look at vault.almalinux.org and nvidia.repo.almalinux.org Cheers Francesco -- Francesco Di Nucci System Administrator Compute & Networking Service, INFN Naples Email: francesco.dinucci@na.infn.it On 2026-04-02 17:16, Retrogrid Tech via Devel wrote:

Hello everyone,

We have identified a significant number of non-functioning-repo RPMs and need to know which of these are intentionally non-functional so we can map them correctly in our archive rather than propagating broken repo definitions to enrolled systems.

A simple "intentional" / "defect" next to each in the attached list/report would be fully adequate.

The attached report summary should make it straightforward either to classify these as intentional or to address them as defects.

Thanks,

Benjamin Smith

PS: Apologies if this is not the correct place to report this - Please direct me to the most appropriate channel if this is not it.

For context, we're establishing a temporal mirror of the Enterprise Linux universe - something like a "Wayback Machine" for Linux OS. For completeness, this historical archive includes the results of metalink and mirrorlist queries but many of these do not resolve.

_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@lists.almalinux.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.almalinux.org