AlmaLinux 9.1 and rsync problem
Hey there, I'm using AlmaLinux 9.1 as my backup server using a script. I noticed that if I run: rsync --cc=xxh128.... it reports: unknown checksum name: xxh128 while inside the rsync manual page this checksum is documented. Running rsync --version I get: Checksum list: md5 md4 none Seems that other checksum type where disabled on compilation but reported on documentation. The absence of xxh128/xxh64 is a bug or them are disabled by default on compilation? Thank you in advance.
RHEL by default does not compile in xxhash support for rsync.
We maintain a repo with the (as of now) latest rsync version and xxhash
support enabled. You're welcome to use this.
See point 2 at https://wiki.almalinux.org/Mirrors.html for instructions.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 8:52 AM Alessandro Baggi
Hey there, I'm using AlmaLinux 9.1 as my backup server using a script.
I noticed that if I run:
rsync --cc=xxh128.... it reports:
unknown checksum name: xxh128
while inside the rsync manual page this checksum is documented.
Running rsync --version I get:
Checksum list: md5 md4 none
Seems that other checksum type where disabled on compilation but reported on documentation.
The absence of xxh128/xxh64 is a bug or them are disabled by default on compilation?
Thank you in advance. _______________________________________________ AlmaLinux Users mailing list -- users@lists.almalinux.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.almalinux.org
-- Jonathan Wright AlmaLinux Foundation Mattermost: chat https://chat.almalinux.org/almalinux/messages/@jonathan
Hi Jonathan, thank you for the tips. It worked. I would ask: why they don't enable xxhash support for rsync? There is a technical reason? Thank you in advance Il 13/04/23 16:08, Jonathan Wright ha scritto:
RHEL by default does not compile in xxhash support for rsync.
We maintain a repo with the (as of now) latest rsync version and xxhash support enabled. You're welcome to use this.
See point 2 at https://wiki.almalinux.org/Mirrors.html https://wiki.almalinux.org/Mirrors.html for instructions.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 8:52 AM Alessandro Baggi
mailto:alessandro.baggi@gmail.com> wrote: Hey there, I'm using AlmaLinux 9.1 as my backup server using a script.
I noticed that if I run:
rsync --cc=xxh128.... it reports:
unknown checksum name: xxh128
while inside the rsync manual page this checksum is documented.
Running rsync --version I get:
Checksum list: md5 md4 none
Seems that other checksum type where disabled on compilation but reported on documentation.
The absence of xxh128/xxh64 is a bug or them are disabled by default on compilation?
Thank you in advance. _______________________________________________ AlmaLinux Users mailing list -- users@lists.almalinux.org mailto:users@lists.almalinux.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.almalinux.org mailto:users-leave@lists.almalinux.org
-- Jonathan Wright AlmaLinux Foundation Mattermost: chat https://chat.almalinux.org/almalinux/messages/@jonathan
I'm honestly not sure. Sometimes they are hesitant to enable new features
until they're a bit more proven in the wild.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 9:21 AM Alessandro Baggi
Hi Jonathan,
thank you for the tips. It worked.
I would ask: why they don't enable xxhash support for rsync? There is a technical reason?
Thank you in advance
Il 13/04/23 16:08, Jonathan Wright ha scritto:
RHEL by default does not compile in xxhash support for rsync.
We maintain a repo with the (as of now) latest rsync version and xxhash support enabled. You're welcome to use this.
See point 2 at https://wiki.almalinux.org/Mirrors.html https://wiki.almalinux.org/Mirrors.html for instructions.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 8:52 AM Alessandro Baggi
mailto:alessandro.baggi@gmail.com> wrote: Hey there, I'm using AlmaLinux 9.1 as my backup server using a script.
I noticed that if I run:
rsync --cc=xxh128.... it reports:
unknown checksum name: xxh128
while inside the rsync manual page this checksum is documented.
Running rsync --version I get:
Checksum list: md5 md4 none
Seems that other checksum type where disabled on compilation but reported on documentation.
The absence of xxh128/xxh64 is a bug or them are disabled by default on compilation?
Thank you in advance. _______________________________________________ AlmaLinux Users mailing list -- users@lists.almalinux.org mailto:users@lists.almalinux.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.almalinux.org mailto:users-leave@lists.almalinux.org
-- Jonathan Wright AlmaLinux Foundation Mattermost: chat < https://chat.almalinux.org/almalinux/messages/@jonathan>
AlmaLinux Users mailing list -- users@lists.almalinux.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.almalinux.org
-- Jonathan Wright AlmaLinux Foundation Mattermost: chat https://chat.almalinux.org/almalinux/messages/@jonathan
participants (2)
-
Alessandro Baggi
-
Jonathan Wright